On the aggregation of incomplete preferences

نویسنده

  • László Csató
چکیده

Assume a set of objects is given with information about their bilateral relationships, allowing for incomplete and multiple comparisons as well as different preference intensities. An axiomatic approach is applied for the problem of ranking the objects. Consistency requires the preservation of relative ranking if two sets of such preferences are aggregated. Self-consistency prohibits to assign a lower rank for an object with a better or equivalent performance than another. It is revealed that these two properties cannot be satisfied simultaneously. The impossibility holds under various restrictions on the domain. However, a positive result emerges if only aggregation of ranking problems with the same comparison structure is allowed, which implies possibility in the case of round-robin tournaments. JEL classification number: C44, D71 AMS classification number: 15A06, 91B14

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Harsanyi’s aggregation theorem with incomplete preferences

We provide a generalization of Harsanyi (1955)’s aggregation theorem to the case of incomplete preferences at the individual and social level. Individuals and society have possibly incomplete expected utility preferences that are represented by sets of expected utility functions. Under Pareto indifference, social preferences are represented through a set of aggregation rules that are utilitaria...

متن کامل

INCOMPLETE INTERVAL-VALUED HESITANT FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS IN DECISION MAKING

In this article, we propose a method to deal with incomplete interval-valuedhesitant fuzzy preference relations. For this purpose, an additivetransitivity inspired technique for interval-valued hesitant fuzzypreference relations is formulated which assists in estimating missingpreferences. First of all, we introduce a condition for decision makersproviding incomplete information. Decision maker...

متن کامل

A Collaborative Method of Aggregating Group Opinion Based on Incomplete Preferences

The aggregation of individual preference into the collective consensus opinion is a key issue in decision-making science. Generally, the aggregation methods are based on the complete preferences from all decision makers on all decision objects. In practice, it is common that individuals can be allowed to provide their incomplete preference information constantly because adequate evaluations are...

متن کامل

Arrow theorems in the fuzzy setting

Throughout this paper, our  main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical  mod...

متن کامل

Incomplete Preferences in Single-Peaked Electorates

Incomplete preferences are likely to arise in realworld preference aggregation and voting systems. This paper deals with determining whether an incomplete preference profile is single-peaked. This is essential information since many intractable voting problems become tractable for single-peaked profiles. We prove that for incomplete profiles the problem of determining single-peakedness is NPcom...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1701.06539  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017